Two independent senators are set to oppose Australia’s misinformation and disinformation bill as it advances in the federal Senate.
Senator Tammy Tyrrell from Tasmania cited extensive constituent concerns as her reason for opposing the bill, which aims to reduce false information on social media. Tyrrell questioned how the bill defines “truth” and warned it could lead to a “slippery slope.” Similarly, David Pocock, independent senator for the Australian Capital Territory, expressed his disapproval of the bill in its “current form.”
Bill Summary and Legislative Progress
The Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024 cleared the House of Representatives on Nov. 8 with backing from Labor and some teal MPs. This bill empowers the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to fine social media companies for content that is deemed “false, misleading, deceptive, or causes serious harm,” particularly in areas such as public health, elections, and critical infrastructure. Exemptions apply to content created for news, satire, religion, academia, arts, and science.
Focus Shifts to the Senate
The bill, due for a vote in the Senate before year-end, will need support from the Greens and several independents to pass. Key senators under scrutiny include Jacqui Lambie Network’s Jacqui Lambie, left-leaning independents Lidia Thorpe and Fatima Payman, and former Liberal David Van. Right-leaning senators, including those from One Nation and the United Australia Party, have signaled opposition.
Opposition from Key Senators
Senator Tyrrell shared her reservations on X (formerly Twitter), cautioning against giving social media companies the power to define truth. “One person’s truth can be another’s lie, and both can present evidence,” she wrote, questioning the bill’s vague definitions and its enforceability.
Similarly, Senator Pocock voiced his opposition, emphasizing the need to protect freedom of speech and the right to protest. “Without a Human Rights Act to enshrine these rights, we must tread carefully,” he said. Pocock acknowledged the harms caused by misinformation but argued that people are entitled to their opinions.
Free Speech and Public Safety: Ongoing Debate
Liberal Senator Dave Sharma criticized the bill, arguing that it could harm free speech and give tech companies too much control over online discourse. He mentioned “alarming” feedback from Senate hearings, including human rights concerns. On the other hand, Minister for Communications Michelle Rowland defended the bill, asserting it balances expression and safety by increasing accountability for harmful online content.
International Attention
Elon Musk, owner of social media platform X, weighed in on Nov. 11, accusing the government of favoring “legacy media” to mislead Australians. American author Michael Shellenberger also criticized the bill, calling it a “totalitarian” effort to limit free speech.
Post a Comment